Calculate usable RAID capacity, parity or mirror overhead and how many drive failures RAID 0, 1, 5, 6 and 10 survive, in TB and the TiB Windows shows.
Aggiornato Esempi verificati: 6
RAID 5 on 4 drives of 8 TB gives 24 TB usable (21.83 TiB in the binary units Windows shows), 75% of the raw space, and always survives 1 failed drive.
Drive labels use 1 TB = 10¹² bytes. Windows divides by 2⁴⁰ but still prints “TB”, so a new drive looks about 9% smaller there; macOS reports decimal TB.
One drive's worth of parity is spread across all drives. Every member counts as the smallest drive in the set.
1 drive
Usable capacity is the drive size times the number of drives' worth of space that holds data: n for RAID 0 striping, 1 for a RAID 1 mirror, n − 1 for RAID 5 single parity, n − 2 for RAID 6 double parity and n ÷ 2 for RAID 10 striped mirrors. The rest of the raw space holds copies or parity, which is what lets the array keep running after a drive fails.
People use it to size a NAS or server before buying drives. The default, four 8 TB drives in RAID 5, gives 24 TB usable out of 32 TB raw, 75% efficiency, and survives one failed drive. In Windows the same space appears as 21.83 TB, because Windows divides by 2^40 (the binary TiB) but prints "TB".
The results assume identical drives; with mixed sizes, each drive counts as the smallest one. File-system metadata, hot spares and reserved space are not subtracted, so the room left for files is slightly lower.
Fonte di verifica: Python 3.8 decimal: (4 − 1) × 8 = 24 TB; 24e12 / 2**40 = 21.8279 TiB; 8e12 / 2**40 = 7.2760 TiB
Fonte di verifica: Python 3.8: (6 − 2) × 4 = 16; 16/24 = 66.67%
Fonte di verifica: Python 3.8: 4 / 2 × 2 = 4 TB; with 2 mirror pairs one failure per pair is survivable, but two in the same pair are not
Fonte di verifica: Definition: every member holds a full copy
RAID 5 gives (n − 1) × drive size, because one drive's worth of space holds parity. Four 8 TB drives give 24 TB (75%) and eight give 56 TB (87.5%). It needs at least 3 drives and survives exactly one failure. Efficiency rises as you add drives, but so does the amount of data a rebuild must read without hitting a second failure.
RAID 6 stores two independent parities (P and Q) instead of one, so it survives any 2 failed drives at the cost of a second drive's capacity. With six 4 TB drives, RAID 5 gives 20 TB and RAID 6 gives 16 TB. A small random write costs 4 disk I/Os on RAID 5 and 6 on RAID 6, so RAID 6 writes are slower.
RAID 10 is faster and rebuilds more safely, while RAID 5 stores more. RAID 10 always keeps 50% of raw space, so 4 × 8 TB gives 16 TB against 24 TB for RAID 5. A small random write costs 2 disk I/Os instead of 4, and a rebuild copies one mirror partner instead of reading every drive. RAID 10 survives 1 failure for certain and up to half its drives if each is in a different pair.
Drive makers use decimal units, 1 TB = 10^12 bytes, while Windows divides by 2^40 = 1,099,511,627,776 bytes and still labels the result TB. 8 × 10^12 ÷ 2^40 = 7.28, so no space is missing; the gap is about 9% at terabyte scale. IEC 80000-13 names the binary unit the tebibyte (TiB). Macs have reported decimal units since OS X Snow Leopard.
No. RAID keeps an array running through drive failures, but deletions, ransomware encryption and file-system corruption reach every drive at once, and RAID 0 has no redundancy at all. Keep separate backups: CISA recommends the 3-2-1 rule, which means 3 copies of important files, on 2 different media types, with 1 copy stored off-site.
La precisione dipende dai dati inseriti e dalle ipotesi del metodo. Il calcolo decimale usa 50 cifre significative, ma stime, metodi numerici e dati di origine possono essere meno precisi; l’arrotondamento visualizzato non elimina questi limiti. Esempi svolti verificati con fonti indipendenti: 6. Per esempio, «RAID 5 with 4 × 8 TB» viene verificato con Python 3.8 decimal: (4 − 1) × 8 = 24 TB; 24e12 / 2**40 = 21.8279 TiB; 8e12 / 2**40 = 7.2760 TiB.
SNIA Common RAID Disk Data Format (DDF) Specification, rev. 2.0 — RAID level definitions; Patterson, Gibson & Katz (1988), A Case for Redundant Arrays of Inexpensive Disks (RAID), SIGMOD; IEC 80000-13:2008 — binary prefixes (1 TiB = 2⁴⁰ bytes).
Questa calcolatrice include 6 esempi svolti con risposte da fonti indipendenti. Fanno parte della suite di test e puoi eseguirli anche qui.
Download or upload time for a file at a given speed, the data a link moves in a set time, and a website's monthly bandwidth from page views.
Find the network address, broadcast, usable host range and host count of any IPv4 or IPv6 CIDR block, with netmask, wildcard and equal subnets.
Operation counts and running times for O(1), O(log n), O(n), O(n log n), O(n²), O(n³), O(2ⁿ) and O(n!) at your input size, on a log-scale chart.