CalcOpenly
English

Calorie and macro calculator

Daily calorie target for losing, maintaining or gaining weight, with macros in grams of protein, carbohydrate and fat per day and per meal.

Drafted with AI writing toolsUpdated Checked examples: 4

years
Accepts 5'11" or 5 ft 11 in
Try
Daily calorie target
kcal/day
Daily calorie target: 2,006 kcal/day
Whole number; Nearest, ties away from zero
Maintenance calories (TDEE)
2,556kcal/day
Daily deficit (−) or surplus (+)
−550kcal/day
Protein
100g/day
Carbohydrate
251g/day
Fat
67g/day
Calories per meal
669kcal
Protein per meal
33g
Protein per kg of body weight
1.4g/kg
The 7,700 kcal per kg rule overstates long-term loss because energy use falls as weight drops (Hall et al., 2011), so the target drifts as weight changes.

By the 7,700 kcal per kg rule, losing about 0.5 kg a week corresponds to about 2,006 kcal a day, 550 kcal below maintenance, which the balanced split turns into 100 g protein, 251 g carbohydrate and 67 g fat.

Balanced split by calories

2,006kcal/day
Protein100 gCarbohydrate251 gFat67 g
Per-meal distribution (even split) Rows: 3
MealkcalProtein (g)Carbs (g)Fat (g)
Meal 1669338422
Meal 2669338422
Meal 3669338422
How it's calculated S
  1. Maintenance calories (Mifflin-St Jeor × activity)

    TDEE=1,648.75×1.55=2,555.56 kcal/day\text{TDEE} = 1{,}648.75 \times 1.55 = 2{,}555.56\ \text{kcal/day}
  2. Daily deficit for 0.5 kg a week

    0.5×77007=550.00  ⇒  target=2,555.56−550.00=2,005.56\frac{0.5 \times 7700}{7} = 550.00 \;\Rightarrow\; \text{target} = 2{,}555.56 - 550.00 = 2{,}005.56

    7,700 kcal per kg is the static ≈ 3,500 kcal per pound rule.

  3. Split into grams (Atwater 4 / 4 / 9 kcal per g)

    P=2,005.6×20%4=100.3 g, C=⋯×50%4=250.7 g, F=⋯×30%9=66.9 g\text{P} = \frac{2{,}005.6 \times 20\%}{4} = 100.3\ \text{g},\ \text{C} = \frac{\cdots \times 50\%}{4} = 250.7\ \text{g},\ \text{F} = \frac{\cdots \times 30\%}{9} = 66.9\ \text{g}

    Preset splits are conventions, not clinical standards; the balanced preset sits inside the AMDR.

  4. Divide across 3 meals

    2,005.63=668.5 kcal per meal\frac{2{,}005.6}{3} = 668.5\ \text{kcal per meal}

About the calorie and macro calculator

The calculation starts from maintenance calories (TDEE), the Mifflin-St Jeor BMR times an activity factor. For a weight-change goal it adds or subtracts the weekly rate × 7,700 kcal per kg ÷ 7 days. The target is then split into protein, carbohydrate and fat with the Atwater factors of 4, 4 and 9 kcal per gram, and divided across your meals.

People use it to turn a goal such as losing 0.5 kg a week into daily numbers. For the default 30-year-old man (70 kg, 175 cm, moderately active), maintenance is 2,556 kcal, a 550 kcal deficit gives a 2,006 kcal target, and the balanced split is 100 g protein, 251 g carbohydrate and 67 g fat.

The 7,700 kcal per kg rule is static: energy needs fall as weight drops, so real loss slows over time (Hall et al., 2011). Splits outside the US Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution Ranges, which are population ranges, are flagged.

How many calories to eat to lose weight

Work out your maintenance calories (TDEE), then subtract 550 kcal a day for each 0.5 kg a week you want to lose, from the rule of 7,700 kcal per kg. A woman who maintains her weight on 2,022 kcal would eat about 1,472 kcal a day. To gain, add the surplus instead.

Worked example: from body size to a daily target

Take a 40-year-old woman who weighs 80 kg, is 165 cm tall, is lightly active and wants to lose 0.5 kg a week:

  1. Resting energy by the Mifflin-St Jeor equation: 10 × 80 + 6.25 × 165 − 5 × 40 − 161 = 1,470.25 kcal. For men the last term is +5 instead of −161.
  2. Maintenance (TDEE): 1,470.25 × 1.375 for light activity = 2,021.6 kcal.
  3. Deficit: 0.5 kg × 7,700 kcal ÷ 7 days = 550 kcal, so the target is 2,021.6 − 550 = 1,471.6, about 1,472 kcal.
  4. Macros on a 20/50/30 split, at 4 kcal per gram of protein or carbohydrate and 9 per gram of fat: 20% of 1,471.6 is 294.3 kcal, or 74 g of protein; 50% is 184 g of carbohydrate; 30% is 441.5 kcal, or 49 g of fat.

Over three meals, that is 491 kcal and 25 g of protein each.

The activity factors are 1.2 for a desk job with little exercise, 1.375 for light exercise 1–3 days a week, 1.55 for moderate exercise 3–5 days, 1.725 for hard exercise 6–7 days and 1.9 for a physical job or training twice a day.

The BMR and TDEE calculator sets the Harris-Benedict and Katch-McArdle equations beside Mifflin-St Jeor, so you can see how much the starting number depends on the equation.

Calorie deficit by rate of weight loss

Each weekly rate becomes a fixed daily deficit. For the same woman, whose maintenance is 2,022 kcal a day, these rows show the arithmetic, not recommended intakes:

Loss per weekDaily deficitDaily targetDeficit as share of maintenance
0.25 kg275 kcal1,747 kcal13.6 %
0.5 kg550 kcal1,472 kcal27.2 %
0.75 kg825 kcal1,197 kcal40.8 %
1 kg1,100 kcal922 kcal54.4 %
1 lb (0.454 kg)499 kcal1,523 kcal24.7 %
2 lb (0.907 kg)998 kcal1,024 kcal49.4 %

The NHLBI practical guide on adult obesity aims for 1 to 2 lb a week and notes that faster loss does not give better long-term results. The NHS gives 0.5 to 1 kg a week.

A fixed deficit takes a bigger share of a smaller intake. At 1 kg a week this woman would cut more than half her maintenance, leaving 922 kcal, below the NHLBI low-calorie range for women.

Calories to gain weight

The rule works in reverse. Gaining 0.25 kg a week takes a surplus of 275 kcal a day, and 0.5 kg a week takes 550 kcal. For the same woman, 0.25 kg a week means about 2,297 kcal a day. For muscle gain, check protein against the targets below.

Why weight loss slows on the same calories

A smaller body uses less energy, so a fixed intake leaves a shrinking deficit. With age, height and activity unchanged, each kilogram lost lowers Mifflin-St Jeor resting energy by 10 kcal.

At 75 kg, the woman's maintenance falls by 50 × 1.375 = 68.75 kcal, to 1,952.84 kcal. Eating the old 1,471.59 kcal leaves a smaller deficit of 481.25 kcal, not 550. Recalculating with the same 0.5 kg rate gives a new target of 1,403 kcal.

In Hall and colleagues' 2011 model, a sedentary 100 kg man who cuts 480 kcal a day levels off near 75 kg. He reaches half of that loss in about a year and 95% of it in about three years.

Hall's team calculated that the static 7,700 kcal rule predicts 22 kg lost in the first year for the same cut, about twice what their model predicts. Treat any target as a starting point.

How much protein you need

Protein needs scale with body weight, not with calories. Published targets, in grams per kilogram of body weight per day:

SituationProtein (g/kg/day)Source
RDA for healthy adults0.8Institute of Medicine, 2005
Exercising adults building or keeping muscle1.4 to 2.0ISSN position stand, 2017
Resistance training for muscle gainabout 1.6, up to 2.2Morton et al., 2018
Lean, resistance-trained, in a deficit2.3 to 3.1 per kg of fat-free massHelms et al., 2014

Morton's meta-analysis of 49 trials found no further gain in fat-free mass from resistance training above about 1.62 g/kg a day. Its 95% confidence interval ran to 2.2 g/kg, which the authors suggested for people aiming for the largest gain.

Helms's range is per kilogram of lean mass, which the body fat calculator estimates. To set protein from body weight alone, use the protein intake calculator.

Macro splits compared

A macro split is a share of calories, so protein grams fall as the deficit grows. On the 1,472 kcal target, the four preset splits give:

Preset (protein / carbs / fat)ProteinCarbohydrateFatProtein per kg
Balanced (20 / 50 / 30)74 g184 g49 g0.92 g/kg
Low-carb (30 / 20 / 50)110 g74 g82 g1.38 g/kg
High-protein (40 / 30 / 30)147 g110 g49 g1.84 g/kg
Keto (20 / 5 / 75)74 g18 g123 g0.92 g/kg

The US Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution Ranges are 10–35% of energy from protein, 45–65% from carbohydrate and 20–35% from fat. Only the balanced split sits inside all three.

The balanced split leaves this dieter just above the 0.8 g/kg RDA, while the high-protein split clears Morton's 1.6 g/kg. The same share gives more grams on a bigger budget: 20% protein is 150 g at 3,000 kcal but 75 g at 1,500 kcal.

A custom split must add up to exactly 100%.

How low is too low?

The NHLBI guide sets low-calorie diets at 1,000 to 1,200 kcal a day for most women, and 1,200 to 1,600 for men and for women who weigh 165 lb or more or exercise regularly. It calls diets under 800 kcal very-low-calorie diets.

Very-low-calorie diets need special monitoring and, the guide says, should not be used routinely.

NICE guideline NG246, recommendations 1.16.8 to 1.16.11, limits diets of 800 to 1,200 kcal a day to supported, multicomponent care for people with obesity, or with overweight and type 2 diabetes.

Under NG246, diets below 800 kcal belong in specialist care for people with obesity and a clinically assessed need for rapid weight loss. Both kinds need supervision, nutritional completeness and a limit of 12 weeks.

Because NICE reserves diets of 1,200 kcal or less for supervised care, get medical advice before following a target in that range. The method is for adults and makes no adjustment for pregnancy or breastfeeding.

For a model that tracks weight over time toward a goal date, the NIDDK Body Weight Planner is also built for non-pregnant, non-breastfeeding adults.

Mistakes that throw the numbers off

  • Counting exercise twice. The activity factor already includes your training. Adding the calories from a calories burned calculator on top counts the same sessions again.
  • Keeping an old target. Recalculate every few kilograms; at the same intake, the deficit shrinks as your weight falls.
  • Mixing kilograms and pounds. A weekly rate of 1 lb is a 499 kcal daily deficit; 1 kg is 1,100 kcal.
  • Judging by one weigh-in. Compare averages over two or three weeks before you change the target.

Worked examples

Maintain, balanced split, 3 meals

Sex (for the formula)
Male
Age
30 years
Weight
70 kg
Height
175 cm
Activity level
Moderately active (×1.55)
Goal
Maintain
Macro split
Balanced
Meals per day
3
Daily calorie target
2,556 kcal/day
Protein
128 g/day
Carbohydrate
319 g/day
Fat
85 g/day
Calories per meal
852 kcal

Checked against: Mifflin 1648.75 × 1.55 = 2555.5625; 20 %/4, 50 %/4, 30 %/9 → 127.778, 319.445, 85.185 g; ÷ 3 meals

Lose 0.5 kg a week, high-protein, 4 meals

Sex (for the formula)
Female
Age
35 years
Weight
70 kg
Height
168 cm
Activity level
Lightly active (×1.375)
Goal
Lose weight
Change per week
0.5 kg
Macro split
High-protein
Meals per day
4
Maintenance calories (TDEE)
1,944 kcal/day
Daily deficit (−) or surplus (+)
-550 kcal/day
Daily calorie target
1,394 kcal/day
Protein
139 g/day
Carbohydrate
105 g/day
Fat
46 g/day
Calories per meal
349 kcal

Checked against: Mifflin 1414 × 1.375 = 1944.25; 0.5 × 7700 / 7 = 550; 40/30/30 split at 4/4/9 kcal per g

Gain 0.5 lb a week on keto

Sex (for the formula)
Male
Age
25 years
Weight
80 kg
Height
180 cm
Activity level
Very active (×1.725)
Goal
Gain weight
Change per week
0.5 lb
Macro split
Keto
Meals per day
3
Daily deficit (−) or surplus (+)
249 kcal/day
Daily calorie target
3,363 kcal/day
Protein
168 g/day
Carbohydrate
42 g/day
Fat
280 g/day

Checked against: 0.5 lb = 0.226796185 kg × 7700 / 7 = 249.4758035; Mifflin 1805 × 1.725 = 3113.625; 20/5/75 split

Zero rate with a custom split

Sex (for the formula)
Female
Age
28 years
Weight
55 kg
Height
160 cm
Activity level
Moderately active (×1.55)
Goal
Lose weight
Change per week
0 kg
Macro split
Custom
Protein share
30%
Carbohydrate share
40%
Fat share
30%
Meals per day
5
Daily calorie target
1,936 kcal/day
Daily deficit (−) or surplus (+)
0 kcal/day
Protein
145 g/day
Carbohydrate
194 g/day
Fat
65 g/day
Protein per meal
29 g

Checked against: Mifflin 1249 × 1.55 = 1935.95 with no deficit; 30/40/30 split; ÷ 5 meals

Questions

What calorie deficit loses 0.5 kg a week?

About 550 kcal a day by the usual rule of 7,700 kcal per kg (3,500 kcal per pound, from Wishnofsky 1958): 0.5 × 7,700 ÷ 7 = 550. The NHLBI adult obesity guidance pairs a deficit of 500 to 1,000 kcal a day with a loss of 1 to 2 lb (0.45 to 0.9 kg) a week. Measured loss usually slows after the first weeks because energy needs fall as weight drops.

Why does weight loss slow down on the same calories?

A smaller body uses less energy, so a fixed intake produces a shrinking deficit. Hall and colleagues' 2011 model in The Lancet found that the body weight response to a change in intake has a half-time of about a year; for an average overweight adult, each 100 kJ (24 kcal) a day cut from intake eventually lowers weight by about 1 kg. The static 7,700 kcal per kg rule ignores this and overstates long-term loss.

What macro split is recommended for adults?

The US Dietary Reference Intakes set Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution Ranges of 10–35 % of energy from protein, 45–65 % from carbohydrate and 20–35 % from fat, ranges linked with lower chronic disease risk while meeting nutrient needs. The balanced preset here (20/50/30) sits inside all three. The high-protein, low-carb and keto presets fall outside the carbohydrate range and are flagged.

How do you convert calories into grams of protein, carbs and fat?

Divide the calories from each macronutrient by its Atwater factor: 4 kcal per gram for protein and carbohydrate and 9 for fat (alcohol is 7), the general factors listed by FAO. On a 2,006 kcal target split 20/50/30, that is 401 ÷ 4 = 100 g protein, 1,003 ÷ 4 = 251 g carbohydrate and 602 ÷ 9 = 67 g fat.

About this calculator

target=TDEE±rate (kg/week)×77007,grams=target×share4 (protein, carbs) or 9 (fat)\text{target} = \text{TDEE} \pm \frac{\text{rate (kg/week)} \times 7700}{7},\qquad \text{grams} = \frac{\text{target} \times \text{share}}{4\ \text{(protein, carbs)}\ \text{or}\ 9\ \text{(fat)}}

Sources

  1. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids (2005) — AMDR
  2. FAO. Food energy — methods of analysis and conversion factors (Food and Nutrition Paper 77, 2003) — Atwater general factors
  3. Wishnofsky M. Caloric equivalents of gained or lost weight. Am J Clin Nutr 1958;6:542–546
  4. Hall KD et al. Quantification of the effect of energy imbalance on bodyweight. Lancet 2011;378:826–837
  5. NHLBI. The Practical Guide: Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults (2000)

For information only, not medical advice. These formulas describe populations, not you; talk to a clinician before acting on a result.

Checked against references

This calculator includes 4 worked examples with independently sourced answers. They run in the test suite, and you can run them here too.

Put this calculator on your site

Paste this where you want the calculator to appear. It is free to use, it stays in step with corrections made here, and the credit line below it links back so your readers can find the full version.

Height
Preview the embed

Keep the credit line. It is the only condition, and it is what keeps these calculators free.