70 kg, 175 cm
- Weight
- 70 kg
- Height
- 175 cm
- BSA (Mosteller)
- 1.84 m²
- BSA (DuBois)
- 1.85 m²
- BSA (Haycock)
- 1.85 m²
Checked against: √(175 × 70 / 3600) = 1.844662; 0.007184 × 70^0.425 × 175^0.725 = 1.848143; 0.024265 × 70^0.5378 × 175^0.3964 = 1.846776
Body surface area (BSA) in m² from height and weight by the Mosteller, DuBois and Haycock formulas, with the spread between them.
By AdminDrafted with AI writing toolsUpdated Checked examples: 4
Your body surface area is about 1.84 m² by Mosteller; DuBois gives 1.85 m² and Haycock 1.85 m², a spread of 0.2 %.
Body surface area (BSA) is the total area of the skin, estimated here from height and weight with three formulas. Mosteller (1987) takes the square root of height in centimetres times weight in kilograms divided by 3600. DuBois (1916) and Haycock (1978) raise weight and height to fitted powers. The spread shows how far the three disagree.
Many chemotherapy drugs are dosed in mg per m², cardiac output is divided by BSA to give cardiac index, and kidney function (eGFR) is reported per 1.73 m². At the default 70 kg and 175 cm, Mosteller gives 1.84 m², and DuBois and Haycock both round to 1.85 m².
For adults of average build the formulas agree within about 1.5 %, but they drift apart in obesity: at 120 kg and 170 cm they range from 2.28 to 2.44 m². Dosing protocols state which formula their doses assume.
Multiply height in centimeters by weight in kilograms, divide by 3,600 and take the square root. That is the Mosteller formula (1987). For 175 cm and 70 kg, 175 × 70 ÷ 3,600 = 3.4028, and √3.4028 = 1.84 m², close to the average adult's 1.8 m².
With weight W in kilograms and height H in centimeters:
The power formulas need a calculator with an x^y key. For the same 70 kg, 175 cm adult:
The three differ in where they came from:
Each row gives weight in kilograms and height in centimeters, with BSA rounded to two decimals. Spread is the largest estimate minus the smallest, as a percentage of Mosteller, worked from unrounded values.
| Weight, kg | Height, cm | Mosteller, m² | DuBois, m² | Haycock, m² | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 70 | 175 | 1.84 | 1.85 | 1.85 | 0.2% |
| 60 | 165 | 1.66 | 1.66 | 1.66 | 0.1% |
| 80 | 180 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.01 | 0.5% |
| 120 | 170 | 2.38 | 2.28 | 2.44 | 6.9% |
| 3.5 | 50 | 0.22 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 7.2% |
| 10 | 75 | 0.46 | 0.44 | 0.46 | 5.7% |
| 20 | 110 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 1.0% |
| 400 | 280 | 5.58 | 5.45 | 5.68 | 4.1% |
For the three average-build adults in the first rows, the formulas agree within 0.5 %. They drift apart in obesity: at 120 kg and 170 cm they run from 2.28 to 2.44 m², a 6.9 % spread.
The weight exponents explain the order. DuBois raises weight to the power 0.425, Mosteller to 0.5 and Haycock to 0.5378, so at a fixed height Haycock climbs fastest as weight rises and DuBois slowest.
Small children show the DuBois shortfall Haycock described. For a 3.5 kg, 50 cm newborn, DuBois gives 0.209 m² against 0.220 m² for Mosteller and 0.224 m² for Haycock.
Many chemotherapy drugs are dosed in milligrams per square meter, so a 75 mg/m² dose for a 1.84 m² adult is 138 mg. Cardiac output divided by BSA gives the cardiac index.
Kidney function is reported per 1.73 m², a reference adult's surface area. A person with a BSA of 2.1 m² filters about 21 % more in absolute terms than their reported eGFR.
An adult comparison study found the formulas diverge across body-size groups, including obesity. Dosing protocols state which formula their doses assume.
A BSA figure does not set a dose on its own. The protocol names the formula, and the treating team accounts for organ function, the indication and dose limits.
For weight relative to height, use the BMI calculator. The eGFR calculator reports kidney filtration per 1.73 m², and the dosage by weight calculator handles doses given per kilogram.
Checked against: √(175 × 70 / 3600) = 1.844662; 0.007184 × 70^0.425 × 175^0.725 = 1.848143; 0.024265 × 70^0.5378 × 175^0.3964 = 1.846776
Checked against: With 90.718474 kg and 182.88 cm: 2.146741, 2.130382, 2.160487
Checked against: Independent calculation
Checked against: Independent calculation
About 1.8 m². In 3,613 UK adults receiving chemotherapy in 2005, Sacco and colleagues (PLoS One 2010) found a mean of 1.79 m²: 1.91 m² for men and 1.71 m² for women. eGFR is normalised to a reference adult of 1.73 m², so a person with a BSA of 2.1 m² has an absolute kidney filtration rate about 21 % higher than the reported eGFR.
BSA in m² equals the square root of height in centimetres times weight in kilograms, divided by 3600. For 175 cm and 70 kg that is √(175 × 70 ÷ 3600) = √3.40 = 1.84 m². R. D. Mosteller published it in a 1987 letter to the New England Journal of Medicine as a simpler alternative to the DuBois formula that can be worked out on a pocket calculator.
DuBois is the least suited to small children. Haycock and colleagues measured 81 subjects from premature infants to adults and found that the DuBois formula increasingly underestimated surface area below 0.7 m², by 7.96 % in newborns. For a 3.5 kg, 50 cm newborn, DuBois gives 0.209 m² against Haycock's 0.224 m² and Mosteller's 0.220 m². DuBois itself was fitted to only 9 people.
Metabolic rate, blood volume and drug clearance were found to scale more closely with surface area than with weight across body sizes, so mg per m² became the standard way to scale cytotoxic doses. A 75 mg/m² dose for a 1.84 m² adult is 138 mg. BSA explains only part of the variation in clearance between patients, and some drugs, such as carboplatin, are dosed on kidney function instead.
For information only, not medical advice. These formulas describe populations, not you; talk to a clinician before acting on a result.
This calculator includes 4 worked examples with independently sourced answers. They run in the test suite, and you can run them here too.