CalcOpenly
English

Body surface area calculator

Body surface area (BSA) in m² from height and weight by the Mosteller, DuBois and Haycock formulas, with the spread between them.

Drafted with AI writing toolsUpdated Checked examples: 4

Accepts 5'11" or 5 ft 11 in
Try
BSA (Mosteller)
m²
BSA (Mosteller): 1.84 m²
Decimal places: 2; Nearest, ties to even
BSA (DuBois)
1.85m²
BSA (Haycock)
1.85m²
Spread between formulas
0.2%

Your body surface area is about 1.84 m² by Mosteller; DuBois gives 1.85 m² and Haycock 1.85 m², a spread of 0.2 %.

Body surface area by formula (m²)

Mosteller1.84 m²DuBois1.85 m²Haycock1.85 m²
How it's calculated S
  1. Height in centimetres, weight in kilograms

    h=175 cm,w=70 kgh = 175\ \text{cm},\quad w = 70\ \text{kg}
  2. Mosteller (1987)

    175×703600=1.8447 m2\sqrt{\frac{175 \times 70}{3600}} = 1.8447\ \text{m}^2
  3. DuBois (1916)

    0.007184×700.425×1750.725=1.8481 m20.007184 \times 70^{0.425} \times 175^{0.725} = 1.8481\ \text{m}^2
  4. Haycock (1978)

    0.024265×700.5378×1750.3964=1.8468 m20.024265 \times 70^{0.5378} \times 175^{0.3964} = 1.8468\ \text{m}^2

About the body surface area calculator

Body surface area (BSA) is the total area of the skin, estimated here from height and weight with three formulas. Mosteller (1987) takes the square root of height in centimetres times weight in kilograms divided by 3600. DuBois (1916) and Haycock (1978) raise weight and height to fitted powers. The spread shows how far the three disagree.

Many chemotherapy drugs are dosed in mg per m², cardiac output is divided by BSA to give cardiac index, and kidney function (eGFR) is reported per 1.73 m². At the default 70 kg and 175 cm, Mosteller gives 1.84 m², and DuBois and Haycock both round to 1.85 m².

For adults of average build the formulas agree within about 1.5 %, but they drift apart in obesity: at 120 kg and 170 cm they range from 2.28 to 2.44 m². Dosing protocols state which formula their doses assume.

How to calculate body surface area (BSA)

Multiply height in centimeters by weight in kilograms, divide by 3,600 and take the square root. That is the Mosteller formula (1987). For 175 cm and 70 kg, 175 × 70 ÷ 3,600 = 3.4028, and √3.4028 = 1.84 m², close to the average adult's 1.8 m².

Mosteller, DuBois and Haycock formulas

With weight W in kilograms and height H in centimeters:

  • Mosteller (1987): BSA = √(H × W ÷ 3,600)
  • DuBois (1916): BSA = 0.007184 × W^0.425 × H^0.725
  • Haycock (1978): BSA = 0.024265 × W^0.5378 × H^0.3964

The power formulas need a calculator with an x^y key. For the same 70 kg, 175 cm adult:

  1. DuBois: 70^0.425 = 6.0837 and 175^0.725 = 42.287, so BSA = 0.007184 × 6.0837 × 42.287 = 1.848 m².
  2. Haycock: 70^0.5378 = 9.8241 and 175^0.3964 = 7.7471, so BSA = 0.024265 × 9.8241 × 7.7471 = 1.847 m².
  3. Mosteller, for comparison, gives 1.845 m² before rounding to 1.84.

The three differ in where they came from:

  • DuBois and DuBois fitted their equation to only 9 people.
  • Mosteller's 1987 letter offered a simpler alternative to DuBois that works on a pocket calculator.
  • Haycock and colleagues measured 81 subjects from premature infants to adults. They found DuBois increasingly underestimated surface area below 0.7 m², by 7.96 % in newborns.

BSA chart: the three formulas compared

Each row gives weight in kilograms and height in centimeters, with BSA rounded to two decimals. Spread is the largest estimate minus the smallest, as a percentage of Mosteller, worked from unrounded values.

Weight, kgHeight, cmMosteller, m²DuBois, m²Haycock, m²Spread
701751.841.851.850.2%
601651.661.661.660.1%
801802.002.002.010.5%
1201702.382.282.446.9%
3.5500.220.210.227.2%
10750.460.440.465.7%
201100.780.780.781.0%
4002805.585.455.684.1%

For the three average-build adults in the first rows, the formulas agree within 0.5 %. They drift apart in obesity: at 120 kg and 170 cm they run from 2.28 to 2.44 m², a 6.9 % spread.

The weight exponents explain the order. DuBois raises weight to the power 0.425, Mosteller to 0.5 and Haycock to 0.5378, so at a fixed height Haycock climbs fastest as weight rises and DuBois slowest.

Small children show the DuBois shortfall Haycock described. For a 3.5 kg, 50 cm newborn, DuBois gives 0.209 m² against 0.220 m² for Mosteller and 0.224 m² for Haycock.

What body surface area is used for

Many chemotherapy drugs are dosed in milligrams per square meter, so a 75 mg/m² dose for a 1.84 m² adult is 138 mg. Cardiac output divided by BSA gives the cardiac index.

Kidney function is reported per 1.73 m², a reference adult's surface area. A person with a BSA of 2.1 m² filters about 21 % more in absolute terms than their reported eGFR.

An adult comparison study found the formulas diverge across body-size groups, including obesity. Dosing protocols state which formula their doses assume.

A BSA figure does not set a dose on its own. The protocol names the formula, and the treating team accounts for organ function, the indication and dose limits.

Common BSA mistakes

  • Putting pounds and inches into the formulas. The constants assume kilograms and centimeters. 200 lb and 6 ft are 90.718474 kg and 182.88 cm, which give a Mosteller BSA of 2.15 m².
  • Taking the square root of height alone. The root covers the whole product of height and weight divided by 3,600.
  • Swapping formulas. Use the formula the protocol names, not whichever result is smallest, and keep the same one when comparing results over time.

For weight relative to height, use the BMI calculator. The eGFR calculator reports kidney filtration per 1.73 m², and the dosage by weight calculator handles doses given per kilogram.

Worked examples

70 kg, 175 cm

Weight
70 kg
Height
175 cm
BSA (Mosteller)
1.84 m²
BSA (DuBois)
1.85 m²
BSA (Haycock)
1.85 m²

Checked against: √(175 × 70 / 3600) = 1.844662; 0.007184 × 70^0.425 × 175^0.725 = 1.848143; 0.024265 × 70^0.5378 × 175^0.3964 = 1.846776

200 lb, 6 ft

Weight
200 lb
Height
6 ft
BSA (Mosteller)
2.15 m²
BSA (DuBois)
2.13 m²
BSA (Haycock)
2.16 m²

Checked against: With 90.718474 kg and 182.88 cm: 2.146741, 2.130382, 2.160487

Child 10 kg, 75 cm

Weight
10 kg
Height
75 cm
BSA (Mosteller)
0.46 m²
BSA (DuBois)
0.44 m²
BSA (Haycock)
0.46 m²

Checked against: Independent calculation

Edge: newborn 3.5 kg, 50 cm

Weight
3.5 kg
Height
50 cm
BSA (Mosteller)
0.22 m²
BSA (DuBois)
0.21 m²
BSA (Haycock)
0.22 m²

Checked against: Independent calculation

Questions

What is the average body surface area of an adult?

About 1.8 m². In 3,613 UK adults receiving chemotherapy in 2005, Sacco and colleagues (PLoS One 2010) found a mean of 1.79 m²: 1.91 m² for men and 1.71 m² for women. eGFR is normalised to a reference adult of 1.73 m², so a person with a BSA of 2.1 m² has an absolute kidney filtration rate about 21 % higher than the reported eGFR.

What is the Mosteller formula?

BSA in m² equals the square root of height in centimetres times weight in kilograms, divided by 3600. For 175 cm and 70 kg that is √(175 × 70 ÷ 3600) = √3.40 = 1.84 m². R. D. Mosteller published it in a 1987 letter to the New England Journal of Medicine as a simpler alternative to the DuBois formula that can be worked out on a pocket calculator.

Which BSA formula is best for children?

DuBois is the least suited to small children. Haycock and colleagues measured 81 subjects from premature infants to adults and found that the DuBois formula increasingly underestimated surface area below 0.7 m², by 7.96 % in newborns. For a 3.5 kg, 50 cm newborn, DuBois gives 0.209 m² against Haycock's 0.224 m² and Mosteller's 0.220 m². DuBois itself was fitted to only 9 people.

Why are chemotherapy doses based on body surface area?

Metabolic rate, blood volume and drug clearance were found to scale more closely with surface area than with weight across body sizes, so mg per m² became the standard way to scale cytotoxic doses. A 75 mg/m² dose for a 1.84 m² adult is 138 mg. BSA explains only part of the variation in clearance between patients, and some drugs, such as carboplatin, are dosed on kidney function instead.

About this calculator

Mosteller=h⋅w3600,DuBois=0.007184 w0.425h0.725,Haycock=0.024265 w0.5378h0.3964(h cm, w kg)\text{Mosteller} = \sqrt{\frac{h \cdot w}{3600}},\quad \text{DuBois} = 0.007184\, w^{0.425} h^{0.725},\quad \text{Haycock} = 0.024265\, w^{0.5378} h^{0.3964}\quad(h\ \text{cm},\ w\ \text{kg})

Sources

  1. Mosteller RD. Simplified calculation of body-surface area. N Engl J Med 1987;317(17):1098
  2. DuBois D, DuBois EF. A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. Arch Intern Med 1916;17:863–871
  3. Haycock GB, Schwartz GJ, Wisotsky DH. Geometric method for measuring body surface area: a height-weight formula validated in infants, children, and adults. J Pediatr 1978;93(1):62–66

For information only, not medical advice. These formulas describe populations, not you; talk to a clinician before acting on a result.

Checked against references

This calculator includes 4 worked examples with independently sourced answers. They run in the test suite, and you can run them here too.

Put this calculator on your site

Paste this where you want the calculator to appear. It is free to use, it stays in step with corrections made here, and the credit line below it links back so your readers can find the full version.

Height
Preview the embed

Keep the credit line. It is the only condition, and it is what keeps these calculators free.