Measured g = 9.72 against 9.81
- Calculate
- Percent error
- Measured value
- 9.72
- Accepted (true) value
- 9.81
- Percent error
- 0.9174%
- Signed percent error
- -0.9174%
- Absolute error
- 0.09
Checked against: |9.72 − 9.81| / 9.81 × 100 = 0.9174312
Percent error from measured and accepted values, and uncertainty propagation through sums, products, quotients and powers, in quadrature or worst case.
By AdminDrafted with AI writing toolsUpdated Checked examples: 7
The measurement is 0.9174% below the accepted value.
Percent error compares a measurement with an accepted value: |measured − accepted| / |accepted| × 100. Uncertainty propagation works out how the ± uncertainties of inputs carry into a calculated result. For sums and differences the absolute uncertainties combine; for products and quotients the relative uncertainties combine; a power aⁿ multiplies the relative uncertainty by |n|. Independent random errors combine in quadrature (the square root of the sum of squares), and the worst-case option adds them linearly.
The default, a measured g of 9.72 m/s² against the accepted 9.81 m/s², is 0.917% low. Multiplying (2.0 ± 0.1) by (3.0 ± 0.2) gives relative uncertainties of 5% and 6.7%, which combine in quadrature to 8.3%, so the product is reported as 6.0 ± 0.5.
Results are rounded as Taylor's An Introduction to Error Analysis recommends: the uncertainty to one significant figure, or two when it starts with 1, and the value to the same decimal place. The formulas are first-order, so they assume each uncertainty is small compared with its value.
Divide the gap between the measured and accepted values by the accepted value: % error = |measured − accepted| ÷ |accepted| × 100. Measuring g as 9.72 m/s² against the accepted 9.81 m/s² gives 0.09 ÷ 9.81 × 100 = 0.917%. Use it when a trusted reference exists.
Drop the absolute value to keep the direction: (9.72 − 9.81) ÷ 9.81 × 100 = −0.917%, which says the measurement came out low.
The denominator always uses the size of the accepted value. Measuring −9 against an accepted −10 gives a signed error of +10%, because the reading is numerically above the reference.
An accepted value of zero makes percent error undefined. Report the absolute error, |measured − accepted|, in the quantity's own units instead.
Percent error compares one result with a reference. Uncertainty, written ±, is your estimate of how much the measurement itself can vary, and it exists even when no accepted value does.
Use the two together to judge agreement. 9.72 ± 0.12 m/s² is consistent with 9.81, since the 0.09 gap lies inside the uncertainty; 9.72 ± 0.05 m/s² is not.
Absolute uncertainties combine for sums and differences. Relative uncertainties, δa/|a|, combine for products, quotients and powers. For independent random errors, both combine in quadrature:
Subtracting close values is where uncertainty grows. (10.0 ± 0.3) − (9.5 ± 0.4) = 0.5 ± 0.5, a 100% relative uncertainty, although the inputs were uncertain by only 3% and 4.2%.
For a longer formula, apply the rules one operation at a time, as long as each input appears only once. When an input appears twice, its errors are correlated with themselves and the general method in NIST's combination guide applies.
Add in quadrature when the input errors are independent and random. That is the assumption behind the combined standard uncertainty in NIST Technical Note 1297, and the result never exceeds the linear sum.
Add linearly, δa + δb, for a bound that holds even when the errors are correlated, such as two lengths measured with the same faulty ruler. The sum example becomes 15.0 ± 0.7, and the product 6.0 ± 0.7.
Round the uncertainty to one significant figure, or two when its first digit is 1, then round the value to the same decimal place. This is the convention in Taylor's An Introduction to Error Analysis, section 2.2.
An uncertainty of 1.2 starts with 1 and keeps two figures, giving 8.0 ± 1.2. An uncertainty of 0.05 keeps one, so the value is written to two decimals: 2.00 ± 0.05. Carry unrounded numbers through intermediate steps and round once at the end.
Sum quadrature and sum worst case are both (10.0 ± 0.3) + (5.0 ± 0.4). Product is (2.0 ± 0.1) × (3.0 ± 0.2), and cube is (2.0 ± 0.1)³.
| Scenario | Report as |
|---|---|
| Sum quadrature | 15.0 ± 0.5 |
| Sum worst case | 15.0 ± 0.7 |
| Product | 6.0 ± 0.5 |
| Cube | 8.0 ± 1.2 |
To round a result to a chosen number of significant figures, use the rounding calculator. The Ohm's law calculator is a common source of products and quotients to propagate, such as P = V × I.
Checked against: |9.72 − 9.81| / 9.81 × 100 = 0.9174312
Checked against: Taylor §3.5: √(0.3² + 0.4²) = 0.5
Checked against: Taylor §3.3: δa + δb = 0.7
Checked against: 6 × √(0.05² + 0.0667²) = 6 × 0.083333 = 0.5
Percent error = |measured − accepted| / |accepted| × 100. Measuring g as 9.72 m/s² against an accepted 9.81 m/s² gives 0.09/9.81 × 100 = 0.917%. Keep the sign when the direction matters: −0.917% says the measurement came out low. The formula fails when the accepted value is 0; report the absolute error instead.
Combine the relative uncertainties in quadrature: δq/|q| = √((δa/a)² + (δb/b)²). For (2.0 ± 0.1) × (3.0 ± 0.2) the relative uncertainties are 5% and 6.7%, giving 8.3% of 6.0, so q = 6.0 ± 0.5. Division follows the same rule: (10 ± 0.5) ÷ (4 ± 0.2) = 2.50 ± 0.18.
Combine the absolute uncertainties: δq = √(δa² + δb²) when the errors are independent and random, or δa + δb for a worst-case bound. (10.0 ± 0.3) + (5.0 ± 0.4) = 15.0 ± 0.5 in quadrature, or 15.0 ± 0.7 worst case. Subtraction uses the same rule, so the difference of two close values can carry a large relative uncertainty.
When the errors in the inputs are independent and random, the assumption behind the combined standard uncertainty in NIST Technical Note 1297 and the GUM. Quadrature never exceeds the linear sum: 0.3 and 0.4 combine to 0.5 rather than 0.7. Use the linear worst case when errors may be correlated, such as two readings taken with the same miscalibrated instrument.
One, or two when its leading digit is 1, following Taylor's An Introduction to Error Analysis (§2.2); the value is then rounded to the same decimal place. So 0.1768 becomes 0.18 and the result is written 2.50 ± 0.18, while 0.52 becomes 0.5 and the result 6.0 ± 0.5. Writing 6.0 ± 0.5234 claims more precision than the measurement has.
This calculator includes 7 worked examples with independently sourced answers. They run in the test suite, and you can run them here too.